Both sites serve real functions. One sells art through an unconventional pricing model. One presents a book and brings visitors into its world fully enough that they want to own it. Both were built with the same process applied to every client engagement in this practice: concept first, architecture around that, then execution with precision.
These are live platforms.
01 | Mercure en Lion — 24 hours
Mercure en Lion is my art sales platform built around an unusual premise: every work carries the same price, and that price rises with each acquisition across the platform.
Every asset was ready before the build began. Every decision had already been made. The full 24 hours went into architecture, logic, and execution.
The site makes the pricing logic legible at a glance: the full acquisition history, the interactive curve, the works grid. Visitors see exactly where the price is heading and what each new acquisition changes. The mechanism required a functional interactive element, designed to carry the concept rather than decorate it.
Built in 24h
Site architecture
Acquisition curve with interactive slider
Works grid with filtering
Individual work pages
Pricing logic display
Full responsive layout

02 | Voyager l'Invisible — 3 days
Voyager l'Invisible is the site for a book documenting twenty-three sessions of auto-induced trance drawing conducted over one year with Martin Vernier, using a protocol called La Boussole. The primary purpose of the site is to present the book and bring visitors into its world fully enough that they want to own it.
All images were created, selected, and sequenced as part of the build. Texts were shaped for a web reading experience. The three days covered both the creative work and the full technical build.
Visitors arrive without a frame of reference for what trance drawing or La Boussole means. The site builds that frame in the first few seconds, then lets the work carry the rest. The layout mirrors the structure of the book: text and image in dialogue, the protocol made visible and accessible.
Built in 3 days
Site concept
Image creation and selection
Full content architecture
Layout including mirror-reading format
Protocol visualisation
Responsive implementation

03 | The Variable
The difference between 24 hours and 3 days is not effort or quality. It is one variable: asset readiness.
When everything is prepared before the build begins, the work is entirely executional. When content needs to be created as part of the engagement, that creative phase adds time. Both timelines produce the same standard of result.
Knowing which applies to your project is the first question a Sprint Website discovery call answers.
24h
All assets ready
Concept defined, all visuals ready, all texts written. Build is entirely executional.
48h
Assets mostly ready
Assets need selection or light preparation. A small number of decisions remain open.
72h
Assets to create
Images need to be created or sourced. Content needs shaping from source material.
If you have a project that needs to move fast without sacrificing quality or conceptual clarity, let's talk.